Essay --

Instruction or lectures (amount and quality) Academic achievement of students disrupted and decline due to the instructor and lectures factor. Most selective university lecturers are very brilliant in their studies, but they are less skilled to give lectures to the students in the class. This made it difficult for students to understand the content of the lesson presented by the lecturers and make the student feel bored and uninterested. Imparting skills effectively is very important. Lecturers need to know and study the most effective methods to teach and get students' attention. Interesting teaching techniques and can effectively improve student enthusiasm for learning more seriously and diligently to excel in all subjects. Quality of teaching should be clearly described and punctuated by making a lot of refresher training with the students so that students can better understand the lessons taught. Besides, the lecturer should give tips and advice about education and how to answer the exam questions correctly. Environment (home, school, peers and technology) Environmental factors a...

Purpose of a Literature Review Essay

Purpose of a Literature Review – to identify what has already been done/found, in relation to the research topic that is being studied and answers the question of what needs to happen next. – provide a brief overview of research you’ve read. – Demonstrate that you understand the topic and have significant knowledge within the field of study and then make a case. – Making a case may be an analysis of research, study, or conceptual argument. – Also, be sure to include a persuasive argument. – At the end of a literature review you should identify a gap or misinterpretation within the information (identify and explore the gap). My approach to writing this literature review was somewhat similar to the writing of a â€Å"regular† essay. I’ve used this approach in past assignments I’ve completed including such as a narrative and an annotated bibliography. They all have similar characteristics. Thank goodness for this! It gives me an idea of where to start. I believe these common characteristics are the main subject of the piece of writing and evidence/textuality of your point from other readings. Textuality is using pieces of writing from other works to support your points.  Beware, though these essays may serve as a guide, they also have many differences. – What should you do next? *Ponders* – Information! Information! Information! Be resourceful, support your claims, justify your answers. – It is important that you do this in the correct way. – My greatest advice would be to ask your professor for a peer review guide and use it as you write. This will ensure that your writing is clear, organized, flowing, and well-written. If you feel as though you cannot do this for yourself, I’d suggest having someone else read your literature review aloud. Dailyn’s essential steps to writing a literature review; these are my own ideas so I have no proof if they actually worked until I recieve feedback. I’m hoping I pulled this one together. How do you approach literature reviews? Good luck, and until next time. Take care. Literature Reviews What this handout is about This handout will explain what a literature review is and offer insights into the form and construction of a literature review in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences. Introduction OK.  You’ve got to write a literature review. You dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a â€Å"thumbs up† or â€Å"thumbs down† as you leaf through the pages. â€Å"Literature review† done. Right? Wrong! The â€Å"literature† of a literature review refers to any collection of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. â€Å"Literature† could be anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants you to give your personal opinion on whether or not you liked these sources. What is a literature review, then? A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant. But how is a literature review different from an academic research paper? The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper will contain a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions. Why do we write literature reviews? Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers. Who writes these things, anyway? Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Sometimes a literature review is written as a paper in itself.

Do You Believe God - 1587 Words

Do you believe in God? Do you even believe in a God? Is God even real? These questions are commonly asked and the reason for it is because people believe in different things depending on how they were raised growing up. This question is a very in depth question because a lot of people don’t know the real truth or actually understand if a God really does exist. Today I will be arguing against a few different philosophers who don’t believe in a God and are actually atheist. And also I will be agreeing with a few philosophers and taking on that side of why God does exist. But remember everyone in this world are entitled to there own opinion and the reason I say that is because I do not want to offend anybody who believes in something different from everyone else. The first well-known philosopher that I want to talk about is the famous Thomas Aquanis. Thomas will forever be remembered as the guy who supposedly proved the existence of God by arguing that the Universe had to have been created by something, since everything in existence has a beginning and an end. This is now referred to as the â€Å"First Cause† argument, and all philosophers after Thomas have wrestled with proving or disproving the theory. Thomas founded everything he postulated firmly in Christianity, and for this reason, he is not universally popular, today. Even Christians consider that, since he derived all his ethical teachings from the Bible, Thomas is not independently authoritative of any of thoseShow MoreRelatedDo You Believe? God? Essay2362 Words   |  10 PagesDo You Believe in God? Do you believe in a higher power that cannot be touched or seen? Some people believe that there is a higher power known as â€Å"God† and others do not believe that someone can exist that cannot be seen or touched. God is known to be â€Å"Infinitely good† according to philosopher Saint Thomas Aquinas, but other philosophers such as Fredrik Bendz’ do not believe that a God can exist because it simply is not logical. Everyone has their own reasons to why or why not God exists, but inRead MoreDo You Believe in God and Why?824 Words   |  4 PagesDo you believe in God and why? With over 20 major religions in today’s world, God is the most recognized superior power. We are told to believe that this God is a supernatural being: one of a group of supernatural male beings in some religions, each of which is worshiped as the personification or controller of some aspect of the universe. God is the English name given to a singular being in theistic and deistic religions who is either the sole deity in monotheism, or a single deity in polytheismRead MoreDifference Between Faith And Knowledge1561 Words   |  7 Pageskey questions like what is the relationship between faith and knowledge? Is faith in god justified? Why? How? In matters of faith and relationship with God, is the question of the existence of God even relevant? Why or Why not? I am going to answers these key questions in the upcoming paragraphs. I will briefly explain the argument of Pascal’s wager and the reasoning behind it. Is there a God? Should I believe in God? People think about this question everyday. Pascal is famous, among other things forRead MoreThe Argument For The Existence Of God1674 Words   |  7 PagesI do not find the three arguments I analyzed satisfactory for the existence of God. The existence of God simply cannot be proven. Regardless of how strong a person’s faith is, or how many miracles they claim to have witnessed, God can only ever be a possibility. First, I will discuss why Pascal’s wager is not a satisfying argument for the existence of God. I will then examine C.D. Broad’s â€Å"Argument for the Existence of God†, and why it is also not a satisfying argument for the existence of God.Read MoreEvaluation Argument616 Words   |  3 Pagesis the day you were born and the day you find out why you were born. There are all kinds of theories of how life is supposed to be. People believe all sorts of things of how life will be like. I feel like everyone in the world was put on this plant for a reason. We may not always know why we were put here but I think that is the goal in life to figure out why and be the best person you can be and to fulfill that goal. I think that the substance of like to believe and have faith in God. There is aRead MoreThe Lord Has Helped Me1415 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"As he explained to me that he didn’t yet believe in Christ and asked me questions about my faith, I prayed s ilently that the Holy Spirit would speck through me and open his eyes.† (Deadliest Monster pg. 61) The Lord has helped me in many situations in specking of my faith to others or telling others about the amazing gospel that Jesus died on the cross for our sins! Going to a park and giving random people the gospel isn’t easy but what is encouraging is when after asking a homeless guy if weRead MoreJudaism, Christianity, And Islam875 Words   |  4 Pagesare no different. They are all Monotheistic meaning they believe in one sole higher power or God. Though they share this common idea and many other similarity, they have many distinct features of their own that make them different as a whole. Many past religions have believed in the idea of multiple gods, Polytheism. Judaism, Christianity and Islam believe in one Supreme creator, Monotheism. They believe in the faith of God meaning that God is the supreme creator of the universe and everything inRead MoreBelief in a Higher Power and Greek Philosophers1371 Words   |  6 Pagessuch things as a higher power. In my eyes I do believe in such a thing, I believe that Socrates does as well. When reading Euthyphro there are many components to why Socrates believes in the gods. When reading the Apology there are many reasons to why Socrates believes in the gods as well. Finally when reading Crito there are also numerous reasons to why Socrates believes in the gods also. There are many reasons to prove that Socrates does believe in the gods. The discussion in the piece Euthyphro isRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Christianity1486 Words   |  6 Pagesfact that Jesus is the Messiah and is God in the flesh. He is the Son of God. â€Å"I and the Father are one† (John 10:30, NIV). Also, Christianity is unique for their belief in heaven and hell, the belief in the Holy Trinity, we can have a personal relationship with God, God is a forgiving God and salvation is through Jesus Christ only. One of the supreme aspect that separates Christianity from the rest of the world religions is the fact that Christians believe Jesus is the Messiah. Several other religionsRead MorePascal s Wager And The Existence Of God1649 Words   |  7 Pagesempirical evidence of a God, wagering for the existence of God will maximize our happiness. Through his wager, one can use simple reasoning to understand that believing in a God which you cannot see may still be the most logical option to live your life. Pascal states that because there is no evidence that a God exists, nor is there any evidence that no God exists, it is entirely possible that a God exists. Wagering for the existence of an almighty God will either bring you eternal life and happiness

Introducing Shakespeares Globe Theatre

For over 400 years Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre has witnessed Shakespeare’s popularity and endurance. Today, tourists can visit Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London – a faithful reconstruction of the original building sited just a few hundred yards from the original location. Essential Facts: The Globe Theatre was: Able to hold 3,000 spectators Approximately 100 feet in diameterThree stories high Open air Stealing The Globe Theatre Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre was built in Bankside, London in 1598. Remarkably, it was built from the materials salvaged from a theater of similar design just across the River Thames in Shoreditch. The original building, simply named The Theatre, was constructed in 1576 by the Burbage family – a few years later a young William Shakespeare joined Burbage’s acting company. A long-standing dispute over ownership and an expired lease caused problems for Burbage’s troupe and in 1598 the company decided to take matters into their own hands. On 28 December 1598, the Burbage family and a team of carpenters dismantled The Theatre in the dead of night and carried the timbers over the river. The stolen theater was rebuilt and renamed The Globe. To raise finance for the new project, Burbage sold shares in the building – and the business-savvy Shakespeare invested alongside three other actors. Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre – A Sad End! The Globe Theatre burnt down in 1613 when a stage special effect went disastrously wrong. A cannon used for a performance of Henry VIII set light to the thatched roof and the fire quickly spread. Reportedly, it took less than two hours for the building to completely burn to the ground! Industrious as ever, the company quickly bounced back and rebuilt The Globe with a tiled roof. However, the building fell into disuse in 1642 when the Puritans closed all theaters in England. Sadly, Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre was demolished two years later in 1644 to make room for tenements. Rebuilding Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre It was not until 1989 that the foundations of Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre were discovered in Bankside. The discovery spurred the late Sam Wanamaker to pioneer a mammoth fundraising and research project that eventually led to the reconstruction of Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre between 1993 and 1996. Unfortunately, Wanamaker did not live to see the completed theater. Although nobody is certain what The Globe actually looked like, the project pieced together historical evidence and used traditional building techniques to construct a theater that was as faithful as possible to the original. A little more safety-conscious than the original, the newly constructed theater seats 1,500 people (half the original capacity), utilizes fire-retardant materials and uses modern backstage machinery. However, Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre continues to stage Shakespeare’s plays in the open air, exposing the spectators to English weather.

Is Frankenstein Really A Monster - 2155 Words

Is Frankenstein Really a Monster? I. Introduction Ronald Britton is the writer and editorial manager of the article: Mary Shelley s Frankenstein: What Made the Monster Monstrous. Throughout this article Britton will talk about the genesis of the renowned story of Frankenstein, which emerged from a fantasy experienced by Mary Shelley while on an occasion imparted to her spouse and her stride sister. The creator talked upon Shelley expressing that â€Å"She emphasizes that she was not confined to her own identity in these daydreams, she became others and so peopled them with creatures far more interesting than her own sensations† (Britton 2). As a kid Shelley composed stories that were sensible, fabulous, and pleasing; they were her shelter when irritated and her most profound joy when free. One night as Shelley is asleep, she has a striking dream. In the fantasy she sees a revolting apparition of a man extended and after that, on the working of some capable motor, hint at life. Shelley portrays how she is controlled by her wil d creative energy. She expresses that â€Å"This clearly was no daydream. I would call it a night terrors a sleep-induced visual hallucination that persists on waking† (Britton 3). Shelley then builds up the thought that what frightened her will frighten others. She needs to depict the apparition which frequents her midnight pad, so the next day she started to recount to her story. II. Background Shelley depicted Frankenstein s beast as a 8-foot-tall (2.4 m),Show MoreRelatedIs Humanity Really Frankenstein s Monster?1619 Words   |  7 PagesIs Humanity Really Frankenstein’s Monster? According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a monster is described as â€Å"part animal and part human†, â€Å"ferocious†, â€Å"ugly†, and â€Å"frightening†. Yet at the same time, a monster can be â€Å"amazing† and â€Å"extraordinary† . From these characteristics alone, a monster can essentially be anything. In the literal sense, a monster is perceived to be large and physically grotesque, however inner qualities of monstrosity can be easily masked, and are therefore often overlookedRead MoreFrankenstein, By Mary Shelley1650 Words   |  7 PagesWhen first reading the book of Frankenstein does one just think of a mythical science fiction book that really has no meaning? Frankenstein can have numerous meanings depending on how a person perceives it. Frankenstein can be analyzed into many themes; some say religion, feminism, or scientific symbolization, it all depends on ones own perception. When one analyzes further into Mary Shelly†™s life and then interprets the novel it is obvious that is a sociological theme. One can simply assume thatRead MoreFrankenstein Critique866 Words   |  4 PagesAs Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein, she poured much time into portraying her characters and making them believable and life-like. Her scenes are painted with beautiful, descriptive words that are colored with vivid emotions and applicable morals. Her life experiences were strategically placed in her writing to convey a sense of reality and completion of plots and subplots. Her experience with failed love ties in with the emotion that she expresses the loneliness of Frankenstein’s creation. She developsRead MoreThe Significance of Chapter 5 in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley1008 Words   |  5 PagesThe Significance of Chapter 5 in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelly in 1816 and has become perhaps one of the most famous novels in the gothic, horror genre. Shelley was brought up in the 19th century where there were a lot of medical and scientific breakthroughs. These have influenced the novel because during the 19th century people had just discovered new information about the body and that electrical impulses were send via the body to Read MoreWho is the Villain in the Frankenstein? Essay714 Words   |  3 Pagesplaywright of Frankenstein and it has been adapted since then by Phillip Pullman. Mary wrote it in 1818 and it was first performed in 1988, at the Polka Childrens theatre in Wimbledon. In the play, a doctor called Victor Frankenstein created life from an experiment, a monster, and although Frankenstein had intended the monster (who wasnt to be called the monster) to be a kind, caring and loving creature, the way the villagers treated him and turned away in disgust when they saw the monster, was theRead MoreFrankenstein Chapter 18 Frankenstein1531 Words   |  7 PagesMary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a Narrative which tells of Victor Frankenstein and his inhuman creation which he calls, a â€Å"wretch.† She writes entirely the book in modern english, which suits the setting and time frame of the story. Shelly utilizes app roximately five people to narrate her book. The letters in the first twenty-five pages and a majority of Frankenstein is narrated by Robert Walton. Chapters six through eight, through letters, are mainly narrated by Elizabeth Lavenza and Alphonse FrankensteinRead MoreFrankenstein the True Monster1471 Words   |  6 PagesThe Real Monster Science is a broad field which covers many aspects of everyday life and existence. Some areas of science include the study of the universe, the environment, dinosaurs, animals, and insects. Another popular science is the study of people and how they function. In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is an inspiring scientist that studies the dead. He wants to be the first person to give life to a dead human being. He spends all of his time concentrating on thisRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Mary Shelley s Frankenstein Essay1400 Words   |  6 Pagespopular science is the study of people and how they work. In Mary Shelley s Frankenstein, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is a scientist who studies inspiring the dead. He wants to be the first person to give life to a dead human being. all their time to focus on this goal renounces his family and friends passed, and. When finally this is achieved, everything crumbles. So, Victor Frankenstein is to blame for the tragedy, not the monster he has created, because he is the mastermind behind the whole operationRead MoreSigmund Freud s Frankenstein 1299 Words   |  6 Pagesrelation of the uncanny to May Shelley’s Frankenstein, the monster that was created by the character named Victor Frankenstein was greeted with fear by the people he meets. The monster’s treatment of fear put him under the category of Sigmund Freud’s The Uncanny. we see a point of commonality where the relation of the Freudian theory and Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein is implying towards to each other. This implication reveals The Uncanny and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to fear itself as it shows the theoryRead MoreIsolation in Mary Shelley ´s Frankenstien Essays924 Words   |  4 Pagesgothic novel, both the monster and Frankenstein are isolated. Frankenstein will not tell anyone about his creation because he has no one to pour his emotions out to. This causes the loss of his family, friends,and lover. Until the e nd, he tells his experience to the force but was never really believed so his tale is only really heard by Robert Walton, an explorer with ambitions as strong as Victor himself. In Shelleys novel, she characterizes Victor Frankenstein and the monster as being isolated to

If Legislation Fails Who is There to Follow Free Essays

Judge Richard C Wesley, who had worked in the Legislature of New York, and subsequently, in its High Court, gave a speech in the Albany Law School, where in he discussed the technique of appellate judging in Common Law Courts. The second such exposition was at a seminar on the use of legislative history in interpreting New York State and Federal Statue, at the same venue. The discussion dealt with law making and the history of the legislature of this state. We will write a custom essay sample on If Legislation Fails Who is There to Follow? or any similar topic only for you Order Now In respect of Article III of the Constitution, he stated that Congress had limited the powers conferred by the constitution in respect of resolution of cases. With regard to judicial verdicts, he discussed the statutory interpretation in respect of several cases which had a bearing on the future of the State as well as the Courts. Further, he expressed his discontent in respect of the process of Judicial Review, which results in the failure of the Court in framing an opinion. In this context he cited the case of Majewski v Broadalbin – Perth Control School District. The issues discussed were whether the changes in the workers’ compensation law restricting third party tort-fea ·sor seeking contribution from an injured employee’s employer were prospective or retroactive. Though the statute did not provide a clear answer, the Bill’s sponsor in the assembly proclaimed that it was prospective, while the Governor announced at the Bill’s signing that there would be an appreciable reduction in the insurance premia being paid by employers. Based on this outcome, he opined that judges will have to decide what was intended by such legislation. In his opinion, Judicial Activism has been limited to querying the Congress to explain the meaning of the various statutes. In this connection, there are occasions where regulatory or legislative schemes come under scrutiny and come up short under Constitutional Analysis. Judges have to follow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Supreme Court has heard two cases, U.S.V Baker and U.S.V Fanfan, which more or less signals the end of the sentencing schemes under the Constitution. According to him, the will of Congress does not trump the Constitution. This results in Congress forsaking the guidelines as a discretionary sentencing guide and leaving the task to even up the range of sentences to a law based arbitraryness review. In another case, Campaign for Fiscal Equity V New York, the Constitutionality and Federalism of the State were challenged. In 1995, the Court had ruled that the plaintiff’s complaint did plead a cause of action on State Constitutional Grounds. The Constitutional Standard for that Mandate was that the State must provide a sound basic education to all New York Children. The outcome of this case was that the School funding is based on political expediency and not on educational necessity. According to him the Court had transposed the Constitutional Provision from a general commitment to public education into substantive policy – laden guarantee of educational proficiency that would ultimately drag the Courts into a resource allocation fight with the Legislature. Absence of a Legislative Response to a Judicial Decree, declaring the Constitutional shortcomings of a state education system, the Courts have to manage the State’s Education Funding System; this is a job, which the majority of the fiscal equity noted that the Court had neither the authority, the ability nor the will to do. Richard C Wesley expressed his view that the quasi – legislative/ executive role will strain the Courts’ own intellectual and institutional resources, while providing the Executive with an excuse to usurp the Courts’ Powers. He further, contended that Governing and Judging are two dissimilar things and that the public policy is best formulated by means of public debates. Though the Judiciary has been granted an independent existence by the Constitution, in reality the Legislature controls it. Since Legislature is the most powerful wing of the U.S.Government, according to Wesley if it fails, there is no further recourse. The foregoing discussion illustrates the penchant of the legislature to interfere with the functioning of the judiciary. Whenever, the legislature fails to resolve any problem, the judiciary steps in to rectify the same. However, with the legislature making all out efforts to subjugate the judiciary, there is nothing which can retrieve the situation once the legislation fails (Wesley, n.d). References. Wesley, Richard C. (n.d.). If Legislatures Fail, Who is there to Follow? How to cite If Legislation Fails Who is There to Follow?, Essay examples

Abc Learning Case Study free essay sample

ABC Learning Ltd relied heavily on government subsidies, declaring this as futures revenue, and essentially showing profitable business in centres that were in fact not profitable. Critics suggest that the rate of expansion was unsustainable, and that Mr Groves was â€Å"hell-bent on buying as many centres as he could, as quickly as he could [†¦] the price paid was not important – the key was to keep growing at all costs† (Thomson, 2008). Continued spending, from equity in international acquisitions meant that the company had an estimated debt of $1. Billion at the time of receivership. After the fact; courts have heard that Mr Groves ignored the directions of the board that â€Å"passed resolutions between November 2007 and February 2008 that no further centers were to be acquired† (Walsh, 2010), which has put the company founder in the spot light. Mr Groves’ corporate governance practices were poor, and is currently in legal proceedings regarding in terparty transactions, this was certainly news worthy, and damaged the company’s reputation and slowed investor confidence. Additionally, the price paid to companies was deemed to be above market norms, siphoning more money from the companies depleted coffers. Critics are focused on the â€Å"mess† of the books for ABC Learning Centres Ltd, specifically the complex way in which revenue and profits were accounted for, â€Å"particularly the way compensation payments from centre developers were counted as revenue† (Thompson 2008). The Financial position of ABC Learning centres was misrepresented and projected a positive image of the financials, until Auditors Ernst and Young were required to pour over the books after the collapse. All of these issues are summed up in Thompsons (2008) assertion that Groves was the right man to grow the business but not the right man to manage the business, had the right manager been in place then the organization may have been able to turn its fortunes around. The Ethical Issues of the case: Firstly there is a significant Ethical and morale lapse in a share floated company when the CEO engages in related party transactions. The moral issues arise when you consider that so many stakeholders have money invested in the company, they expect decisions to be made on a prudent business basis, whereas in this case the decision to award contracts was not on who provided the best service or the best price, but simply given to related parties, many of whom where owned or majority held by Mr Groves himself (allegedly). Was it morally questionable to ignore the directives of the Board? This is a relatively null question in its self, but considers the people affected by the decision, the impact on the company (as evident by the collapse). The fact is the basic principle here is to ignore the directives of the people whom are employed specifically to gauge the position of the company and take action for its preservation. It could be argued the Groves was following his own ethical and moral compass in his decisions, but the overall running of a company must take more than one man desires to account. Did the shareholders have relevant information about the company’s financial position; was warning of the impending collapse evident in the information provided? Essentially were the financials and position of the company transparent to stakeholders? In short no they were not. The complex account records, that took auditors months to unravel, projected a falsely positive image of the company to stakeholders. Additionally, shares in the company were frozen when the company failed to issue it financial reports on time, at the same time the company went into receivership. The ethical issue here revolves around the deception to shareholders, whom are investing money on false pretence, who could have sold share issues at a small loss, if the information were provided on time. What action has been taken (if any) to address the outcomes of the ethical and legal breaches? Eddy Groves has recently â€Å"pleaded not guilty to one charge of breaching the Corporations Act at the Brisbane Magistrates Court† (Thomson, 2011). The charges were brought by the commonwealth shortly after the collapse when the†ASIC and the companys liquidators began investigating ABCs affairs, unearthing claims of poor disclosure, related-party transactions and mis-management† (Thompson. 2011). The commonwealth government funded the centres during receivership, to ensure the services continued to the hundreds of thousands of children around Australia. Eventually the company was purchased by the not for profit organization ‘Good start’. I will point out that the senate enquiry by the education, employment workplace relations committee (2009) did acknowledge that the private ownership and investments by the company improved the national quality, conditions and service in the industry, as the competition continued to match the innovations of the once market leaders. What action would you take in this situation? Honestly I would not ever find myself in this position. Arrogance on overdrive I know. Groves is a very flamboyantly motivated individual, whose interest seemed to surround the growth of an empire more than the growth of a company. I understand that for every acquisition you borrow against the company assets, for every acquisition there are years before the site is truly owned, or profitable. And even if the sites you purchase are profitable, the company requires cash in its coffers to manager the debts payable (on purchases, stock, wages etc. ) should bad times strike, a safety net as you will. The related party transactions are just stupid. Yes as a person able to send money your family’s way, it is hard to resist, but the fact is – you have to! It’s your job. If you want to allocate the money to relate enterprise then you had best be able to show that the enterprise provided quotes and services better than competitors, without obviously insider trading the issue. Bibliography: Senate education, employment workplace relations committee. (2009). Provision of childcare. Commonwealth of Australia 2009. ISBN 978-1-74229-185-7 Thomson, J. (2008). Five lessons from the spectacular fall of Eddy Groves.